ViewWiki

Answer key · Unit 8

Equilibrium.

Each lesson’s practice questions, their correct answers and the mistakes they spot. Answers read off the Scene use the same setting the learner sees.

Lesson 1 of 4 · About 20 minutes

Reversible reactions

A reaction that runs both ways and never reaches an end: a brown gas that pairs up and splits back, until the mixture stops changing.

Open the lesson

The 5 steps and their answers
  1. Step 1 of 5

    Open this step

    Both ways

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    You seal brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ gas in a flask. NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules pair up into N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, a colourless gas, and each pair can also split back: 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠. What will the flask hold after an hour?

    Correct answer

    • Correct A mixture of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ that no longer changes

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    Start

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct A mixture of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ that no longer changes

    • Wrong Only N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠: all the NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ will pair up

      Misconception: Thinks every reaction runs until one reactant is used up, even a reversible one.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      In a reversible reaction the product can break back down to the reactants. The more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ forms, the more of it splits each second, until splitting catches up with pairing. From then on the amounts stop changing, and the flask holds both NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

    • Wrong Only NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠: every pair that forms will split

      Feedback

      Pairs do split, but new ones form at the same time. As long as there is NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, some of it pairs up.

    Feedback for a right answer

    A reversible reaction does not reach an end: it reaches equilibrium, a mixture of reactants and products whose amounts are fixed. In the Scene the flask grows paler, but never clear.

    Hint

    The double arrow, ⇌\rightleftharpoons⁠, says the reaction runs both ways.

    Worked solution

    1. At first there is only NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, so only pairing happens.
    2. As N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ builds up it starts to split back, at a rate that grows the more of it there is. Pairing slows, because the NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ thins out.
    3. When the rates are equal, as much forms as splits, and the mixture stops changing.

    If you chose “only N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠”, you thought of a reaction that runs only forwards, like burning. A reversible reaction settles in between.

  2. Step 2 of 5

    Open this step

    Watching the colour

    Practice · Predict, then look

    Question

    Time is at Start, just sealed: the flask is all brown. What will happen to the colour as time runs on?

    Correct answer

    • Correct It will pale to a certain shade, then stay that way

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    Start

    Choices

    • Correct It will pale to a certain shade, then stay that way

    • Wrong It will pale until the flask is clear

      Misconception: Thinks every reaction runs until one reactant is used up, even a reversible one.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      In a reversible reaction the product can break back down to the reactants. The more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ forms, the more of it splits each second, until splitting catches up with pairing. From then on the amounts stop changing, and the flask holds both NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

    • Wrong It will not change

      Feedback

      Pairing is very fast: at first there is only NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, and it pairs up at once.

    Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes

    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    The Scene then shows: 23.88 · Share of the nitrogen in brown NO₂, per cent/nodes/flask/outputs/no2Percent

    A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.

    Feedback for a right answer

    The colour pales and stops: about 24%24\%⁠ of the nitrogen stays in brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, the rest in colourless N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. In the concentrations chart both lines flatten out.

    Worked solution

    1. At first only NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, so it pairs up fast and the colour fades.
    2. As N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ forms, its splitting gives back NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠.
    3. At equilibrium pairing and splitting are equal, and the colour stays fixed, a pale brown.

    If you predicted a clear flask, you treated the reaction as if it ran only forwards.

  3. Step 3 of 5

    Open this step

    Counting the nitrogen

    Practice · Calculate

    Question

    You sealed in 40 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. At equilibrium the chart shows about 15.2 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. How much NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is left?

    Correct answer

    9.551 mmol/L ± 0.3 mmol/L

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed
    Accepted within
    ± 0.3 mmol/L
    Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
    NO₂ concentration (mol/m³ is mmol/L)/nodes/flask/outputs/no2

    Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.

    Wrong answers it recognises

    • 24.8 mmol/L ± 0.3 mmol/L

      Misconception: Forgets that each N₂O₄ took two NO₂, subtracting one NO₂ for each N₂O₄ formed.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Each N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ molecule forms from two NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules: 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠. So when 15 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ forms, the NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ drops by 30 mmol/L. Check with the nitrogen: [NO2]+2[N2O4][\mathrm{NO_2}] + 2[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠ always equals what was sealed in at the start.

    Feedback for a right answer

    40−2×15.2=9.640 - 2 \times 15.2 = 9.6⁠, about 9.6 mmol/L: the brown line in the chart. The nitrogen is conserved: 9.6+2×15.2=409.6 + 2 \times 15.2 = 40⁠.

    Hint

    Each N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ molecule took two NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules.

    Worked solution

    1. 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠: each N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ formed uses 22⁠ NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠.
    2. About 15.215.2⁠ formed, so 2×15.2=30.42 \times 15.2 = 30.4⁠ were used.
    3. Left: 40−30.4=9.6 mmol/L40 - 30.4 = 9.6\ \mathrm{mmol/L}⁠.

    If you answered 24.824.8⁠, you subtracted one NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ for each N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

  4. Step 4 of 5

    Open this step

    More in, more out

    Practice · Reach the target

    Question

    Change NO₂ sealed in so that at equilibrium the flask holds 24 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, then press Check.

    Goal

    • 24 mmol/L ± 0.4 mmol/L

      At the start of the step: 15.22 mmol/L

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed
    Read from the Scene at
    N₂O₄ concentration (mol/m³ is mmol/L)/nodes/flask/outputs/n2o4

    One setting that reaches it

    NO₂ sealed in
    60 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    off

    Feedback for a right answer

    At 60 mmol/L: 24 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ and 12 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. One and a half times the nitrogen did not give one and a half times of each: N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ grew more, because pairing goes as the square of [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠.

    Feedback for a wrong answer

    Not yet. Watch the blue line in the concentrations chart.

    Hint

    With 40 mmol/L there is 15.2. To get more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, seal in more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, and watch the chart.

    Worked solution

    1. More NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ at the start gives more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ at equilibrium.
    2. Try: at 50 mmol/L there is about 19.6; at 60 mmol/L there is 24.0.
    3. Check: 12+2×24=6012 + 2 \times 24 = 60⁠, and 0.0240.0122=167\dfrac{0.024}{0.012^2} = 167⁠, close to KK⁠.
  5. Step 5 of 5

    Open this step

    From the other side

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    Instead of 40 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ you seal in, at the same temperature, 20 mmol/L of pure N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠: the same nitrogen. What will the flask hold at equilibrium?

    Correct answer

    • Correct The same mixture: about 9.6 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and 15.2 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct The same mixture: about 9.6 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and 15.2 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠

    • Wrong Only N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠: the reaction makes N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, it does not split it

      Misconception: Thinks equilibrium can only be reached from the reactants, or that starting from the products gives a different mixture.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      An equilibrium does not remember where it started. Seal pure N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ holding the same nitrogen and it splits until the rates are equal, reaching the same mixture exactly: because KK⁠ depends only on the temperature, and NO2+2×N2O4\mathrm{NO_2 + 2 \times N_2O_4}⁠ stays fixed.

    • Wrong A different mixture, with more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, because we started from it

      Misconception: Thinks equilibrium can only be reached from the reactants, or that starting from the products gives a different mixture.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      An equilibrium does not remember where it started. Seal pure N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ holding the same nitrogen and it splits until the rates are equal, reaching the same mixture exactly: because KK⁠ depends only on the temperature, and NO2+2×N2O4\mathrm{NO_2 + 2 \times N_2O_4}⁠ stays fixed.

    Feedback for a right answer

    The same mixture. The N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ splits until the rates are equal, reaching the same point from the other side. An equilibrium does not remember where it started.

    Hint

    The reaction runs both ways, and KK⁠ depends only on the temperature.

    Worked solution

    1. At first only N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, so only splitting: NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ forms.
    2. As NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ forms, pairing grows stronger, until it equals splitting.
    3. The same nitrogen and the same KK⁠ give the same mixture: [N2O4][NO2]2=K\dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2} = K⁠ and [NO2]+2[N2O4]=40[\mathrm{NO_2}] + 2[\mathrm{N_2O_4}] = 40⁠ have one solution.

Lesson 2 of 4 · About 25 minutes

Dynamic equilibrium

Two rates that meet: why nothing changes though the molecules never stop, what is equal at equilibrium and what is not, and the equilibrium constant K.

Open the lesson

The 5 steps and their answers
  1. Step 1 of 5

    Open this step

    Two rates

    Practice · Predict, then look

    Question

    Just after sealing, pairing is 28 times faster than splitting. What will happen to the two rates as time runs on?

    Correct answer

    • Correct Pairing will slow and splitting speed up, until they are equal

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.04 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    • Correct Pairing will slow and splitting speed up, until they are equal

    • Wrong Pairing will slow until it stops, and the reaction will be over

      Misconception: Thinks the reactions stop once equilibrium is reached.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      At equilibrium nothing visible changes, but the molecules do not stop: pairs keep forming and splitting, at exactly the same rate. That is dynamic equilibrium. In the rates chart neither line falls to zero; they meet and run on together.

    • Wrong Both will stay as they are

      Feedback

      The rates depend on the concentrations, and the concentrations are changing: NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is used up and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ builds up.

    Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes

    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    The Scene then shows: 1.035 · Forward (pairing) rate over back (splitting) rate; 1 at equilibrium/nodes/flask/outputs/rateRatio

    A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.

    Feedback for a right answer

    In the rates chart the orange line falls and the blue line rises until they meet: the ratio of the rates reaches 11⁠. From then on both run on together, and neither falls to zero.

    Worked solution

    1. The pairing rate goes as [NO2]2[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2⁠, and the NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ thins out: the rate falls.
    2. The splitting rate goes as [N2O4][\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠, which builds up: the rate rises.
    3. They meet when they are equal, and then the concentrations stop changing, and so do the rates.

    The reaction does not stop: every second billions of pairs still form and split, in equal numbers.

  2. Step 2 of 5

    Open this step

    The molecules never stop

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    The flask is at equilibrium, and its colour no longer changes. What are the molecules doing?

    Correct answer

    • Correct They keep pairing and splitting, at the same rate

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct They keep pairing and splitting, at the same rate

    • Wrong They have stopped reacting: everything that could pair has paired

      Misconception: Thinks the reactions stop once equilibrium is reached.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      At equilibrium nothing visible changes, but the molecules do not stop: pairs keep forming and splitting, at exactly the same rate. That is dynamic equilibrium. In the rates chart neither line falls to zero; they meet and run on together.

    • Wrong Only splitting, very slowly

      Feedback

      If only splitting went on, NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ would build up and the flask would darken.

    Feedback for a right answer

    This is dynamic equilibrium: two opposite processes at the same rate. In the Scene the molecules keep swapping partners, and in the rates chart both lines stay above zero, side by side.

    Hint

    Watch the molecules themselves in the Scene, not just the colour.

    Worked solution

    1. At equilibrium the pairing rate equals the splitting rate.
    2. Each second as many pairs form as split, so the amounts do not change.
    3. The molecules themselves never rest: each one goes back and forth between NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.
  3. Step 3 of 5

    Open this step

    What is equal

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    What is equal at equilibrium?

    Correct answer

    • Correct The pairing rate and the splitting rate

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct The pairing rate and the splitting rate

    • Wrong The concentration of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and the concentration of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠

      Misconception: Thinks that at equilibrium the reactants and products are present in equal amounts.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      At equilibrium the rates are equal, not the amounts. At 25 °C the flask holds about 9.5 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ against 15 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, and in boiling water almost nothing but NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. Where the mix settles is set by KK⁠, which can be very large or very small.

    • Wrong The nitrogen in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and the nitrogen in N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠

      Misconception: Thinks that at equilibrium the reactants and products are present in equal amounts.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      At equilibrium the rates are equal, not the amounts. At 25 °C the flask holds about 9.5 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ against 15 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, and in boiling water almost nothing but NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. Where the mix settles is set by KK⁠, which can be very large or very small.

    Feedback for a right answer

    The rates. The concentrations are steady, but not equal: here 9.5 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ against 15.2 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. In the rates chart the lines meet, and in the concentrations chart they only flatten.

    Hint

    Compare the two charts: in which do the lines meet?

    Worked solution

    1. At equilibrium the forward rate equals the back rate.
    2. The concentrations stop changing, but each stays at its own value.
    3. The ratio between them is fixed: [N2O4][NO2]2=K\dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2} = K⁠, and KK⁠ can be any number.
  4. Step 4 of 5

    Open this step

    The equilibrium constant

    Practice · Calculate

    Question

    At 348 K the flask has settled at [NO2]=0.0284[\mathrm{NO_2}] = 0.0284⁠ and [N2O4]=0.0058[\mathrm{N_2O_4}] = 0.0058⁠, in mol/L. Work out the equilibrium constant, KK⁠, in L/mol, then compare with the line under the chart.

    Correct answer

    7.18 ± 3%

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    348 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed
    Accepted within
    ± 3%
    Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
    Reaction quotient [N₂O₄]/[NO₂]², L/mol (equals K once settled)/nodes/flask/outputs/Q

    Wrong answers it recognises

    • 0.204 ± 3%

      Misconception: Leaves the coefficients out of the equilibrium expression, writing [N₂O₄]/[NO₂] instead of [N₂O₄]/[NO₂]².

      Feedback from the catalogue

      In the expression for KK⁠ each concentration is raised to the power of its coefficient in the equation. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ the coefficient of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is 22⁠, so K=[N2O4][NO2]2K = \dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠. The power comes from each pairing needing two NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules to meet.

    • 0.139 ± 3%

      Misconception: Writes the equilibrium constant with the reactants on top and the products underneath.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      In the equilibrium constant the products go on top and the reactants underneath: K=[products][reactants]K = \dfrac{[\text{products}]}{[\text{reactants}]}⁠, each to the power of its coefficient. So a large KK⁠ means plenty of product at equilibrium.

    Feedback for a right answer

    0.00580.02842=7.2\dfrac{0.0058}{0.0284^2} = 7.2⁠. At 298 K the constant is about 170: heating shrank it 24 times, which is why the mix is so much browner.

    Hint

    K=[N2O4][NO2]2K = \dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠.

    Worked solution

    1. The expression: K=[N2O4][NO2]2K = \dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠, because the coefficient of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is 22⁠.
    2. [NO2]2=0.02842=8.07×10−4[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2 = 0.0284^2 = 8.07 \times 10^{-4}⁠.
    3. K=0.00588.07×10−4=7.2 L/molK = \dfrac{0.0058}{8.07 \times 10^{-4}} = 7.2\ \mathrm{L/mol}⁠.

    If you got 0.2040.204⁠, you forgot the square. If 0.1390.139⁠, you turned the fraction upside down: products go on top.

  5. Step 5 of 5

    Open this step

    Which way the mix moves

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    Shortly after sealing, the line under the chart shows Q=52Q = 52⁠ and K=170K = 170⁠. Which way will the mix move?

    Correct answer

    • Correct Towards N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠: pairing is still faster than splitting

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.2 (Start → Settled)fixed

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct Towards N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠: pairing is still faster than splitting

    • Wrong Towards NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠: QQ⁠ is small, so the reaction goes backwards

      Misconception: Reads Q below K as meaning the mixture will move back towards the reactants.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      QQ⁠ is built like KK⁠, from the concentrations right now. When Q<KQ < K⁠ there is still too little product for equilibrium, so the forward reaction is faster and the mix moves towards the products, until QQ⁠ reaches KK⁠. When Q>KQ > K⁠ it moves back towards the reactants.

    • Wrong Nowhere: the flask is already at equilibrium

      Feedback

      At equilibrium Q=KQ = K⁠. Here QQ⁠ is a third of KK⁠.

    Feedback for a right answer

    When Q<KQ < K⁠ there is too little N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, and the mix carries on towards it until QQ⁠ reaches KK⁠. In the rates chart the orange line is still above the blue.

    Hint

    QQ⁠ is built like KK⁠, from the concentrations right now. A small QQ⁠ says: little product for the reactant.

    Worked solution

    1. Q=[N2O4][NO2]2Q = \dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠ right now, and KK⁠ is its value at equilibrium.
    2. Q=52<K=170Q = 52 < K = 170⁠: the top is too small, or the bottom too large.
    3. For QQ⁠ to grow, you need more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ and less NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠: the reaction carries on forwards.

    Rule of thumb: Q<KQ < K⁠ forwards, Q>KQ > K⁠ backwards, Q=KQ = K⁠ equilibrium.

Lesson 3 of 4 · About 25 minutes

Le Chatelier's principle

What happens when you disturb an equilibrium: add a reactant, heat it or cool it. The system shifts to reduce the disturbance, and only temperature changes K.

Open the lesson

The 5 steps and their answers
  1. Step 1 of 5

    Open this step

    Adding a reactant

    Practice · Predict, then look

    Question

    The flask is at equilibrium, with 9.5 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. A syringe pushes in more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, and [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ jumps to 29.5 mmol/L. What will happen next?

    Correct answer

    • Correct Some of the added NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ will pair up, and [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ will settle between 9.5 and 29.5

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    • Correct Some of the added NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ will pair up, and [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ will settle between 9.5 and 29.5

    • Wrong All of the extra will pair up, and [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ will go back to 9.5

      Misconception: Thinks that after a disturbance the system returns exactly to its old concentrations.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Le Chatelier’s principle says the system reduces the change, not that it undoes it. After NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is added some of it pairs up, but at the new equilibrium there is more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ than before the push, and more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ too. Only the ratio [N2O4][NO2]2\dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠ goes back to KK⁠.

    • Wrong Nothing: the flask was already at equilibrium, and [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ will stay at 29.5

      Misconception: Thinks the reactions stop once equilibrium is reached.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      At equilibrium nothing visible changes, but the molecules do not stop: pairs keep forming and splitting, at exactly the same rate. That is dynamic equilibrium. In the rates chart neither line falls to zero; they meet and run on together.

    Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes

    Push in more NO₂
    on
    Time
    Settled

    The Scene then shows: 11.88 mmol/L · NO₂ concentration (mol/m³ is mmol/L)/nodes/flask/outputs/no2

    A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.

    Feedback for a right answer

    [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ settles at about 11.9 mmol/L: more than before, less than at the push. The mix “fought” the addition and moved towards N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, which rose to 24 mmol/L. That is Le Chatelier’s principle.

    Worked solution

    1. Just after the push QQ⁠ is very small, because the bottom, [NO2]2[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2⁠, grew nine times.
    2. Q<KQ < K⁠, so pairing outruns splitting, and the mix moves towards N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.
    3. It stops when Q=KQ = K⁠ again. That happens before all the extra has paired, because [N2O4][\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠ on top rises too.

    So the system reduces the change rather than undoing it.

  2. Step 2 of 5

    Open this step

    The same constant

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    After the push the flask has settled at a new equilibrium, with more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. What happened to the equilibrium constant, KK⁠?

    Correct answer

    • Correct It did not change: QQ⁠ went back to the same KK⁠

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    on
    Time
    Settled

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct It did not change: QQ⁠ went back to the same KK⁠

    • Wrong It grew, because there is more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠

      Misconception: Thinks adding a reactant or product changes the equilibrium constant.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      The equilibrium constant depends only on the reaction and the temperature. Adding NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ changes QQ⁠, not KK⁠, and the mix moves until QQ⁠ is back at the same KK⁠. Only a change of temperature changes KK⁠ itself.

    • Wrong It shrank, because there is more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠

      Misconception: Thinks adding a reactant or product changes the equilibrium constant.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      The equilibrium constant depends only on the reaction and the temperature. Adding NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ changes QQ⁠, not KK⁠, and the mix moves until QQ⁠ is back at the same KK⁠. Only a change of temperature changes KK⁠ itself.

    Feedback for a right answer

    KK⁠ depends only on the temperature. The push changed QQ⁠, and the mix moved until QQ⁠ was back at the same KK⁠: 0.02410.01192≈170\dfrac{0.0241}{0.0119^2} \approx 170⁠, as before.

    Hint

    Compare the line under the chart at Settled with Push in more NO₂ off and on.

    Worked solution

    1. KK⁠ is set by the reaction and the temperature, which did not change.
    2. The push dropped QQ⁠ below KK⁠, and the reaction ran forwards until Q=KQ = K⁠.
    3. Check at the new equilibrium: [N2O4][NO2]2=0.02410.01192=170\dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2} = \dfrac{0.0241}{0.0119^2} = 170⁠.
  3. Step 3 of 5

    Open this step

    The moment of the push

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    Push in more NO₂ is on and Time is at Start: the moment of the push. Which rate jumped, by the rates chart?

    Correct answer

    • Correct The pairing rate, about ten times; the splitting rate did not change

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    onfixed
    Time
    Startfixed

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct The pairing rate, about ten times; the splitting rate did not change

    • Wrong Both rates jumped by the same amount

      Feedback

      Splitting depends only on [N2O4][\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠, and the syringe added no N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. So it does not jump.

    • Wrong The splitting rate, to get rid of the extra NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠

      Misconception: Reads Q below K as meaning the mixture will move back towards the reactants.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      QQ⁠ is built like KK⁠, from the concentrations right now. When Q<KQ < K⁠ there is still too little product for equilibrium, so the forward reaction is faster and the mix moves towards the products, until QQ⁠ reaches KK⁠. When Q>KQ > K⁠ it moves back towards the reactants.

    Feedback for a right answer

    [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ tripled, so pairing, which goes as its square, rose nine to ten times. Splitting did not change at first. That is exactly Le Chatelier’s principle: the change speeds up the direction that reduces it.

    Hint

    Pairing goes as [NO2]2[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2⁠, and splitting as [N2O4][\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠. Which did the syringe change?

    Worked solution

    1. The pairing rate: kf[NO2]2k_f[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2⁠. [NO2][\mathrm{NO_2}]⁠ rose from 9.59.5⁠ to 29.529.5⁠, 3.13.1⁠ times, so the rate rose 3.12≈9.63.1^2 \approx 9.6⁠ times.
    2. The splitting rate: kb[N2O4]k_b[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠, and [N2O4][\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠ did not change at the push.
    3. Pairing is now faster, and the mix moves towards N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

    A reaction does not “decide” to get rid of an excess: the rates are simply set by the concentrations.

  4. Step 4 of 5

    Open this step

    Heating it

    Practice · Predict, then look

    Question

    Pairing, 2NO2→N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightarrow N_2O_4}⁠, gives out 57 kJ/mol, and splitting takes it in. What will happen to the colour at equilibrium when you heat the flask from 298 K to 348 K?

    Correct answer

    • Correct It will darken: heating favours splitting, which takes heat in

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed

    Choices

    • Correct It will darken: heating favours splitting, which takes heat in

    • Wrong It will pale: heat speeds the reaction forwards

      Misconception: Thinks heating always shifts an equilibrium towards the products, because heat speeds reactions up.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Heating speeds up both directions, but not equally: it favours the direction that takes in heat. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ pairing gives out 57 kJ/mol, so splitting takes it in, and heating moves the mix back, to brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. In the Haber reaction too, which gives out heat, heating lowers the amount of ammonia at equilibrium.

    • Wrong It will not change: heating only makes equilibrium come sooner

      Misconception: Thinks temperature changes only how fast equilibrium is reached, not where it lies.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Temperature changes KK⁠ itself, and so the mix the system settles at. In the flask: in ice water about 9%9\%⁠ of the nitrogen is left in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ at equilibrium, and in boiling water about 87%87\%⁠. A catalyst, by contrast, changes only the speed.

    Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes

    Temperature
    348 K

    The Scene then shows: 71.02 · Share of the nitrogen in brown NO₂, per cent/nodes/flask/outputs/no2Percent

    A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.

    Feedback for a right answer

    The share of the nitrogen in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ jumps from 24%24\%⁠ to 71%71\%⁠, and the flask turns dark brown. Heating is a “change” the system reduces: it soaks up heat by splitting N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. KK⁠ falls from 170 to 7.

    Worked solution

    1. Le Chatelier’s principle: a system at equilibrium that is disturbed shifts so as to reduce the disturbance.
    2. The disturbance is heat coming in. The direction that takes heat in is splitting, N2O4→2NO2\mathrm{N_2O_4 \rightarrow 2NO_2}⁠.
    3. So the mix moves to brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, and KK⁠ falls.

    Heating speeds up both directions, but the one that takes in heat more. And temperature, unlike a catalyst, changes KK⁠ itself.

  5. Step 5 of 5

    Open this step

    Half and half

    Practice · Reach the target

    Question

    Change Temperature so that at equilibrium exactly half the nitrogen is in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and half in N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, then press Check.

    Goal

    • 50 ± 1

      At the start of the step: 23.88

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/Lfixed
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed
    Read from the Scene at
    Share of the nitrogen in brown NO₂, per cent/nodes/flask/outputs/no2Percent

    One setting that reaches it

    Temperature
    326 K
    Push in more NO₂
    off

    Feedback for a right answer

    At about 326 K, that is 53 °C. At that temperature K=0.0100.0202=25K = \dfrac{0.010}{0.020^2} = 25⁠. A few degrees change the mix a lot, which is why this flask works as a colour thermometer.

    Feedback for a wrong answer

    Not yet. Heat to move nitrogen into NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, cool to move it into N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

    Hint

    Half the nitrogen in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ means [NO2]=20[\mathrm{NO_2}] = 20⁠ and [N2O4]=10[\mathrm{N_2O_4}] = 10⁠, in mmol/L. Watch the concentrations chart.

    Worked solution

    1. At 298 K only 24%24\%⁠ of the nitrogen is in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠: you need more, so heat.
    2. At 348 K it is already 71%71\%⁠: come back down a little.
    3. Around 326 K you reach [NO2]=20[\mathrm{NO_2}] = 20⁠ and [N2O4]=10[\mathrm{N_2O_4}] = 10⁠, half and half.

Lesson 4 of 4 · About 20 minutes

Equilibrium in industry

Pressure, temperature and a catalyst in the Haber process, which makes the ammonia for fertilisers: why squeeze, why not cool all the way, and what the catalyst does not do.

Open the lesson

The 5 steps and their answers
  1. Step 1 of 5

    Open this step

    Squeezing

    Practice · Predict, then look

    Question

    The flask holds 20 mmol/L, and about 32%32\%⁠ of the nitrogen is in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. What will happen to that share when you seal in gas four times as dense, 80 mmol/L, at the same temperature?

    Correct answer

    • Correct It will shrink: in a denser gas a bigger share pairs up

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    20 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed

    Choices

    • Correct It will shrink: in a denser gas a bigger share pairs up

    • Wrong It will stay 32%32\%⁠: the temperature and KK⁠ have not changed

      Misconception: Thinks raising the pressure (or concentration) of a gas mixture cannot move its equilibrium.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      When the gas is squeezed, the mix moves to the side with fewer gas molecules, because that lowers the pressure. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ two molecules become one, so a denser gas holds more of its nitrogen in N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. Pressure matters only when the two sides have different numbers of molecules.

    • Wrong It will grow: there is more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠

      Feedback

      There is more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ in number, but the question is about the share. In a denser gas pairs form more often, because pairing goes as the square of the concentration.

    Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes

    NO₂ sealed in
    80 mmol/L

    The Scene then shows: 17.59 · Share of the nitrogen in brown NO₂, per cent/nodes/flask/outputs/no2Percent

    A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.

    Feedback for a right answer

    The share drops to 18%18\%⁠. In a denser gas, as in a squeezed one, the mix moves to the side with fewer molecules: two NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules become one. KK⁠ has not changed; only the way to satisfy it.

    Worked solution

    1. K=[N2O4][NO2]2K = \dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠ does not change when every concentration grows four times.
    2. But if both grew four times, QQ⁠ would be four times smaller: 442=14\dfrac{4}{4^2} = \tfrac14⁠.
    3. For QQ⁠ to get back to KK⁠, a bigger share of the NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ pairs up.

    Pressure affects only gas reactions whose two sides have different numbers of molecules.

  2. Step 2 of 5

    Open this step

    A quarter

    Practice · Reach the target

    Question

    Change NO₂ sealed in so that at equilibrium a quarter of the nitrogen, 25%25\%⁠, is in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠, then press Check.

    Goal

    • 25 ± 0.5

      At the start of the step: 17.59

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 Kfixed
    NO₂ sealed in
    80 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)fixed
    Read from the Scene at
    Share of the nitrogen in brown NO₂, per cent/nodes/flask/outputs/no2Percent

    One setting that reaches it

    NO₂ sealed in
    35 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    off

    Feedback for a right answer

    At 35 mmol/L. For less to pair up, the gas has to be thinner: like lowering the pressure.

    Feedback for a wrong answer

    Not yet. The denser the gas, the smaller the share in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠.

    Hint

    At 80 mmol/L the share is 18%18\%⁠, and at 20 mmol/L 32%32\%⁠. A lower concentration leaves more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠.

    Worked solution

    1. The share in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ grows as the gas gets thinner.
    2. At 40 mmol/L it is 23.9%23.9\%⁠, a little too little: thin it.
    3. At 35 mmol/L it is 25.3%25.3\%⁠.
  3. Step 3 of 5

    Open this step

    The Haber process

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    Ammonia, the raw material of most fertilisers, is made by the Haber process: N2+3H2⇌2NH3\mathrm{N_2 + 3H_2 \rightleftharpoons 2NH_3}⁠, ΔH=−92 kJ\Delta H = -92\ \mathrm{kJ}⁠. Under which conditions is there the most ammonia at equilibrium?

    Correct answer

    • Correct High pressure and low temperature

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct High pressure and low temperature

    • Wrong High pressure and high temperature

      Misconception: Thinks heating always shifts an equilibrium towards the products, because heat speeds reactions up.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Heating speeds up both directions, but not equally: it favours the direction that takes in heat. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ pairing gives out 57 kJ/mol, so splitting takes it in, and heating moves the mix back, to brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. In the Haber reaction too, which gives out heat, heating lowers the amount of ammonia at equilibrium.

    • Wrong Low pressure and low temperature

      Misconception: Thinks raising the pressure (or concentration) of a gas mixture cannot move its equilibrium.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      When the gas is squeezed, the mix moves to the side with fewer gas molecules, because that lowers the pressure. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ two molecules become one, so a denser gas holds more of its nitrogen in N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. Pressure matters only when the two sides have different numbers of molecules.

    Feedback for a right answer

    Four gas molecules on the left and two on the right, so high pressure shifts right. Joining gives out heat, so cooling shifts right. Just as in 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠: there cold and dense gives more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

    Hint

    Count the gas molecules on each side, and see which direction gives out heat.

    Worked solution

    1. Pressure: 1+3=41 + 3 = 4⁠ molecules become 22⁠. High pressure favours the side with fewer molecules: the ammonia.
    2. Temperature: ΔH<0\Delta H < 0⁠, so making ammonia gives out heat. Cooling favours the direction that gives out heat: the ammonia.
    3. So high pressure and low temperature.
  4. Step 4 of 5

    Open this step

    A compromise

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    If cooling gives more ammonia, why do plants run the Haber process at about 450 °C and not at room temperature?

    Correct answer

    • Correct At a low temperature the reaction is far too slow, and the plant would make very little each hour

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct At a low temperature the reaction is far too slow, and the plant would make very little each hour

    • Wrong At a high temperature there is more ammonia at equilibrium

      Misconception: Thinks heating always shifts an equilibrium towards the products, because heat speeds reactions up.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Heating speeds up both directions, but not equally: it favours the direction that takes in heat. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ pairing gives out 57 kJ/mol, so splitting takes it in, and heating moves the mix back, to brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. In the Haber reaction too, which gives out heat, heating lowers the amount of ammonia at equilibrium.

    • Wrong The temperature does not change the amount of ammonia at all, only the speed

      Misconception: Thinks temperature changes only how fast equilibrium is reached, not where it lies.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      Temperature changes KK⁠ itself, and so the mix the system settles at. In the flask: in ice water about 9%9\%⁠ of the nitrogen is left in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ at equilibrium, and in boiling water about 87%87\%⁠. A catalyst, by contrast, changes only the speed.

    Feedback for a right answer

    It is a compromise. In the cold there is plenty of ammonia at equilibrium, but it takes a very long time to get there, because breaking N≡N\mathrm{N \equiv N}⁠ has a high barrier. At 450 °C, with an iron catalyst and about 200 atmospheres, each pass gives about 15%15\%⁠ ammonia, fast. Whatever did not react goes back into the reactor.

    Hint

    Equilibrium says how much ammonia there will be in the end. What does collision theory say about when?

    Worked solution

    1. Equilibrium: a low temperature gives more ammonia, because the reaction gives out heat.
    2. Rate: a low temperature gives a very slow reaction, because few collisions clear the barrier.
    3. A plant needs both a lot and fast, so it picks a middling temperature, high pressure and a catalyst, and recycles the gases that did not react.
  5. Step 5 of 5

    Open this step

    The catalyst

    Practice · Choose

    Question

    What does the iron catalyst in the Haber process do to the amount of ammonia at equilibrium?

    Correct answer

    • Correct Nothing: equilibrium arrives sooner, but with the same amount of ammonia

    Setup, choices and feedback

    The Scene at this step

    Temperature
    298 K
    NO₂ sealed in
    40 mmol/L
    Push in more NO₂
    offdefault
    Time
    0.9 (Start → Settled)

    Choices

    Shown in a random order.

    • Correct Nothing: equilibrium arrives sooner, but with the same amount of ammonia

    • Wrong It increases it, because it speeds up making ammonia

      Misconception: Thinks a catalyst moves an equilibrium towards the products and so increases the yield.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      A catalyst lowers the barrier for both directions by the same amount, so it speeds the forward and the back reaction by the same factor. Equilibrium arrives sooner, but it is the same equilibrium, with the same KK⁠ and the same amount of product.

    • Wrong It decreases it, because it speeds up the breakdown too

      Misconception: Thinks a catalyst moves an equilibrium towards the products and so increases the yield.

      Feedback from the catalogue

      A catalyst lowers the barrier for both directions by the same amount, so it speeds the forward and the back reaction by the same factor. Equilibrium arrives sooner, but it is the same equilibrium, with the same KK⁠ and the same amount of product.

    Feedback for a right answer

    A catalyst lowers the barrier for both directions by the same amount, so it speeds up making and breaking ammonia by the same factor. KK⁠ does not change, and nor does the final mix. What the catalyst gives is time: the same ammonia, in minutes instead of years.

    Hint

    A catalyst lowers the hump on the energy profile. From which side is it climbed?

    Worked solution

    1. On the energy profile, the hump of the back reaction is the same hump, seen from the products’ side.
    2. A catalyst lowers the hump, and so both barriers, speeding up both directions.
    3. The balance between the rates at equilibrium, KK⁠, does not change.

Across the unit · 14 misconceptions

Misconception catalogue

Each common mistake this unit recognises, in a few words. Open one for what the learner reads when an answer matches it, and where it is asked.

  • Thinks every reaction runs until one reactant is used up, even a reversible one.

    The learner reads

    In a reversible reaction the product can break back down to the reactants. The more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ forms, the more of it splits each second, until splitting catches up with pairing. From then on the amounts stop changing, and the flask holds both NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ and N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠.

  • Thinks equilibrium can only be reached from the reactants, or that starting from the products gives a different mixture.

    The learner reads

    An equilibrium does not remember where it started. Seal pure N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ holding the same nitrogen and it splits until the rates are equal, reaching the same mixture exactly: because KK⁠ depends only on the temperature, and NO2+2×N2O4\mathrm{NO_2 + 2 \times N_2O_4}⁠ stays fixed.

  • Forgets that each N₂O₄ took two NO₂, subtracting one NO₂ for each N₂O₄ formed.

    The learner reads

    Each N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ molecule forms from two NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules: 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠. So when 15 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ forms, the NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ drops by 30 mmol/L. Check with the nitrogen: [NO2]+2[N2O4][\mathrm{NO_2}] + 2[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]⁠ always equals what was sealed in at the start.

  • Thinks the reactions stop once equilibrium is reached.

    The learner reads

    At equilibrium nothing visible changes, but the molecules do not stop: pairs keep forming and splitting, at exactly the same rate. That is dynamic equilibrium. In the rates chart neither line falls to zero; they meet and run on together.

  • Thinks that at equilibrium the reactants and products are present in equal amounts.

    The learner reads

    At equilibrium the rates are equal, not the amounts. At 25 °C the flask holds about 9.5 mmol/L of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ against 15 mmol/L of N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠, and in boiling water almost nothing but NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. Where the mix settles is set by KK⁠, which can be very large or very small.

  • Leaves the coefficients out of the equilibrium expression, writing [N₂O₄]/[NO₂] instead of [N₂O₄]/[NO₂]².

    The learner reads

    In the expression for KK⁠ each concentration is raised to the power of its coefficient in the equation. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ the coefficient of NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is 22⁠, so K=[N2O4][NO2]2K = \dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠. The power comes from each pairing needing two NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ molecules to meet.

  • Writes the equilibrium constant with the reactants on top and the products underneath.

    The learner reads

    In the equilibrium constant the products go on top and the reactants underneath: K=[products][reactants]K = \dfrac{[\text{products}]}{[\text{reactants}]}⁠, each to the power of its coefficient. So a large KK⁠ means plenty of product at equilibrium.

  • Reads Q below K as meaning the mixture will move back towards the reactants.

    The learner reads

    QQ⁠ is built like KK⁠, from the concentrations right now. When Q<KQ < K⁠ there is still too little product for equilibrium, so the forward reaction is faster and the mix moves towards the products, until QQ⁠ reaches KK⁠. When Q>KQ > K⁠ it moves back towards the reactants.

  • Thinks that after a disturbance the system returns exactly to its old concentrations.

    The learner reads

    Le Chatelier’s principle says the system reduces the change, not that it undoes it. After NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ is added some of it pairs up, but at the new equilibrium there is more NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ than before the push, and more N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠ too. Only the ratio [N2O4][NO2]2\dfrac{[\mathrm{N_2O_4}]}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]^2}⁠ goes back to KK⁠.

  • Thinks adding a reactant or product changes the equilibrium constant.

    The learner reads

    The equilibrium constant depends only on the reaction and the temperature. Adding NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ changes QQ⁠, not KK⁠, and the mix moves until QQ⁠ is back at the same KK⁠. Only a change of temperature changes KK⁠ itself.

  • Thinks heating always shifts an equilibrium towards the products, because heat speeds reactions up.

    The learner reads

    Heating speeds up both directions, but not equally: it favours the direction that takes in heat. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ pairing gives out 57 kJ/mol, so splitting takes it in, and heating moves the mix back, to brown NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠. In the Haber reaction too, which gives out heat, heating lowers the amount of ammonia at equilibrium.

  • Thinks temperature changes only how fast equilibrium is reached, not where it lies.

    The learner reads

    Temperature changes KK⁠ itself, and so the mix the system settles at. In the flask: in ice water about 9%9\%⁠ of the nitrogen is left in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}⁠ at equilibrium, and in boiling water about 87%87\%⁠. A catalyst, by contrast, changes only the speed.

  • Thinks raising the pressure (or concentration) of a gas mixture cannot move its equilibrium.

    The learner reads

    When the gas is squeezed, the mix moves to the side with fewer gas molecules, because that lowers the pressure. In 2NO2⇌N2O4\mathrm{2NO_2 \rightleftharpoons N_2O_4}⁠ two molecules become one, so a denser gas holds more of its nitrogen in N2O4\mathrm{N_2O_4}⁠. Pressure matters only when the two sides have different numbers of molecules.

  • Thinks a catalyst moves an equilibrium towards the products and so increases the yield.

    The learner reads

    A catalyst lowers the barrier for both directions by the same amount, so it speeds the forward and the back reaction by the same factor. Equilibrium arrives sooner, but it is the same equilibrium, with the same KK⁠ and the same amount of product.

Index