Answer key · Unit 9
Circular motion and gravity.
Each lesson’s practice questions, their correct answers and the mistakes they spot. Answers read off the Scene use the same setting the learner sees.
Answer key 5
Lesson 1 of 5 · About 25 minutes
Acceleration towards the centre
A ball going round a circle at a steady speed is accelerating all the time. Which way, by how much, and how long does one turn take?
The 6 steps and their answers
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
The ball is going round at 2 m/s on a string 0.6 m long. The string is cut. What path will the ball take?
Correct answer
Correct A straight line along the tangent, the way it was moving when the string was cut
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2 m/s
- String length
- 0.6 m
- Forces, then cut
- Whirlinghidden
Choices
Correct A straight line along the tangent, the way it was moving when the string was cut
Wrong A straight line outward, away from the peg, in line with the string
Misconception: Thinks a ball let go from a circle flies straight outward, away from the centre.
Feedback from the catalogue
The moment the string is cut there is no sideways force on the ball at all, and by Newton’s first law it carries on with the velocity it had at that instant: along the tangent to the circle, at right angles to the string. Nothing was pushing it outward before, so nothing throws it outward now. It does move away from the peg, but only because it goes straight on while the circle would have kept curving.
Wrong It keeps curving, on a widening circle
Misconception: Thinks a ball let go from a circle keeps curving round, as if it remembered the circle.
Feedback from the catalogue
The ball has no memory of the circle. Its path curved only because the string pulled it inward at every moment. Without that pull nothing bends the path, and the ball goes straight on along the tangent, at a steady speed.
Wrong It stops where it is
Feedback
Nothing stops the ball: the table is smooth, and with no force its velocity stays as it was.
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Forces, then cut
- Cut the stringhidden
A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
With no pull, nothing bends the path. The ghosts, at equal spacing, show the ball carrying on along the tangent in a straight line and at the same speed.
Worked solution
- Before the cut, the only sideways force on the ball is the string’s pull, towards the peg.
- When the string is cut, that force is gone too. The weight and the table’s push balance each other, so the net force on the ball is zero.
- By Newton’s first law, a body with no net force on it carries on at a constant velocity in a straight line. At the moment of the cut it is moving at 2 m/s along the tangent, so it carries on like that until the table’s rim stops it.
Choosing “outward” means imagining a force pushing the ball away from the centre; but no such force was acting on it before either.
Practice · Choose
Question
The ball moves on a circle at 2 m/s, and the size of its velocity does not change. Which way does its acceleration point?
Correct answer
Correct Towards the peg, at the centre of the circle
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2 m/s
- String length
- 0.6 m
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)fixed
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct Towards the peg, at the centre of the circle
Wrong It has no acceleration, because its speed is constant
Misconception: Thinks a body moving at a constant speed has no acceleration, even on a circle.
Feedback from the catalogue
Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, and velocity is a vector: a size and a direction. On a circle the size stays the same, but the direction changes all the time, so there is an acceleration. It points towards the centre, and its size is .
Wrong Forward, in the direction of motion
Misconception: Thinks the acceleration, or a force, on a body moving on a circle points forward along its velocity.
Feedback from the catalogue
A force or an acceleration along the motion would change the size of the velocity, and here the size is constant. To change only the direction, the acceleration has to be at right angles to the motion: along the radius, towards the centre. Nothing needs to push the ball forward; without friction it keeps moving on its own.
Wrong Outward, away from the peg
Misconception: Believes an outward centrifugal force acts on the circling body and balances the inward pull.
Feedback from the catalogue
If an outward force balanced the inward pull, the net force would be zero and the body would move in a straight line. It curves precisely because there is a net force inward. What you feel as an outward pull is the ball pulling on the string and your hand (Newton’s third law), or your own body carrying straight on while the car turns underneath it.
Feedback for a right answer
The velocity changes direction at every moment, and that change points towards the centre, like the orange arrow. That is the centripetal acceleration.
Worked solution
- Acceleration is the change in velocity per second, , and velocity is a vector.
- The size of the velocity is constant, 2 m/s, so the acceleration has no part along the motion; only the direction changes.
- Changing the direction alone takes an acceleration at right angles to the velocity. The velocity is along the tangent, so the acceleration is along the radius.
- The string, the only force in the plane of the table, pulls towards the peg, and by the acceleration points the same way: towards the centre.
The common slip is “no acceleration because the speed is constant”: only the size of the velocity is constant here.
Practice · Calculate
Question
The ball moves at 2.5 m/s on a string 0.8 m long. How long does one turn take?
Correct answer
2.011 s ± 2%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2.5 m/sfixed
- String length
- 0.8 mfixed
- Forces, then cut
- Whirlinghidden
- Accepted within
- ± 2%
- Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
- Seconds for one turn, 2πr/v
/nodes/whirl/outputs/period
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
0.32 s ± 3%
Misconception: Divides the radius by the speed for the period, forgetting the circumference 2πr.
Feedback from the catalogue
In one turn the ball covers the whole circumference of the circle, , not one radius. So . Dividing gives only the time to cover one radius, about a sixth of a turn.
Feedback for a right answer
: about half a turn a second.
Hint
In one turn the ball covers the circumference, , at speed .
Worked solution
- The givens: and .
- In one turn the ball covers the circumference, so .
- Put in the numbers: .
- A check through the angular speed: , and .
If you got 0.32 s, you divided the radius by the speed and forgot that a turn covers the whole circumference, radii.
Practice · Calculate
Question
The ball moves at 3 m/s on a string 0.5 m long. What is the size of its acceleration?
Correct answer
18 m/s² ± 2%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 3 m/sfixed
- String length
- 0.5 mfixed
- Forces, then cut
- Whirlinghidden
- Accepted within
- ± 2%
- Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
- Acceleration towards the peg, v²/r
/nodes/whirl/outputs/acceleration
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
6 m/s² ± 3%
Misconception: Uses v/r or v²·r instead of v²/r for the centripetal acceleration.
Feedback from the catalogue
Check the units. gives : that is the angular speed, in radians per second, not an acceleration. gives . Only gives , a unit of acceleration.
4.5 m/s² ± 3%
Misconception: Uses v/r or v²·r instead of v²/r for the centripetal acceleration.
Feedback from the catalogue
Check the units. gives : that is the angular speed, in radians per second, not an acceleration. gives . Only gives , a unit of acceleration.
Feedback for a right answer
, towards the centre: almost twice the acceleration of free fall.
Hint
: the speed squared, divided by the radius.
Worked solution
- The givens: and .
- The centripetal acceleration: .
- Put in the numbers: , towards the peg.
That is almost twice the acceleration of free fall. If you got , you worked out , which is the angular speed in radians per second, not an acceleration; if you got , you multiplied by instead of dividing.
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
On this circle the acceleration is 3.75 m/s². The speed is doubled, from 1.5 m/s to 3 m/s, on the same string. What will the acceleration be?
Correct answer
Correct 15 m/s², four times as much
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 1.5 m/sfixed
- String length
- 0.6 mfixed
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)fixed
Choices
Wrong 3.75 m/s², as before
Feedback
The size of the velocity changed, so the acceleration changes too: the direction has to change faster.
Wrong 7.5 m/s², twice as much
Misconception: Thinks the centripetal acceleration, and the pull, grow in proportion to the speed: twice the speed, twice the pull.
Feedback from the catalogue
The speed comes in squared: . At twice the speed the direction has to change twice as fast, and there is twice as much velocity to turn, so the acceleration, and the pull with it, grow times.
Correct 15 m/s², four times as much
Wrong 30 m/s², eight times as much
Feedback
The speed comes in squared, not cubed: .
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Speed
- 3 m/sfixed
The Scene then shows: 15 m/s² · Acceleration towards the peg, v²/r
/nodes/whirl/outputs/accelerationA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
Four times: . The pull on the orange arrow grew four times too, from 0.75 N to 3 N.
Worked solution
- Before: .
- After: .
- The ratio: , because depends on .
At twice the speed the ball goes round the peg twice as fast, so the blue arrow turns twice as fast, and it is also twice as long. Together the two give four times, not twice.
Practice · Reach the target
Question
Change the Speed and the String length until the ball’s acceleration is 10 m/s², then press Check.
Goal
10 m/s² ± 0.25 m/s²
At the start of the step: 1.667 m/s²
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 1 m/s
- String length
- 0.6 m
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)fixed
- Read from the Scene at
- Acceleration towards the peg, v²/r
/nodes/whirl/outputs/acceleration
One setting that reaches it
- Speed
- 2 m/s
- String length
- 0.4 m
Feedback for a right answer
There is more than one way: any speed and length with . A shorter string needs a lower speed.
Feedback for a wrong answer
Not yet. If the acceleration is too small, raise the speed or shorten the string; if it is too big, do the opposite.
Hint
You need . Pick a string length, and work out the speed that goes with it.
Worked solution
- You want , that is, .
- Pick a string length where is a handy square: at you need , so .
- Check: .
with works too: . Turning up only the speed on the 0.6 m string jumps past the target: at 2.4 m/s the acceleration is 9.6 m/s², and at 2.5 m/s it is already about 10.4 m/s².
Lesson 2 of 5 · About 25 minutes
The force that holds it on the circle
Moving on a circle takes a net force towards the centre, of size m·v²/r. What supplies it, how strong is it, and why is there no force pushing outward?
The 5 steps and their answers
Practice · Choose
Question
Look at the ball from above while it goes round. Which sideways forces act on it?
Correct answer
Correct Only the string’s pull, towards the peg
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2 m/s
- String length
- 0.6 m
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)fixed
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct Only the string’s pull, towards the peg
Wrong The string’s pull inward, and an equal centrifugal force outward
Misconception: Believes an outward centrifugal force acts on the circling body and balances the inward pull.
Feedback from the catalogue
If an outward force balanced the inward pull, the net force would be zero and the body would move in a straight line. It curves precisely because there is a net force inward. What you feel as an outward pull is the ball pulling on the string and your hand (Newton’s third law), or your own body carrying straight on while the car turns underneath it.
Wrong The string’s pull inward, and a forward force that keeps the ball moving
Misconception: Thinks the acceleration, or a force, on a body moving on a circle points forward along its velocity.
Feedback from the catalogue
A force or an acceleration along the motion would change the size of the velocity, and here the size is constant. To change only the direction, the acceleration has to be at right angles to the motion: along the radius, towards the centre. Nothing needs to push the ball forward; without friction it keeps moving on its own.
Wrong The string’s pull inward, and a centripetal force inward as well
Misconception: Adds the centripetal force as a force of its own, on top of the real forces on the body.
Feedback from the catalogue
Centripetal force is not an extra kind of force but the name of a job: the net force pointing at the centre. Here the string’s pull does that job; for a car going round a bend, the friction between tyres and road; for the Moon, gravity. In a free-body diagram you draw only the real forces, and check that their sum points at the centre and equals .
Feedback for a right answer
Only the string. Its pull is the centripetal force: the net force, towards the centre, that turns the velocity.
Worked solution
- What touches the ball? The table underneath and the string. And from a distance the Earth pulls it down.
- The weight and the table’s push are vertical and balance each other, because the ball neither rises nor sinks.
- In the plane of the table only the string is left, and a string can only pull along itself: towards the peg.
- Check: the ball accelerates towards the centre, , so the net force has to point at the centre with size . That is exactly the number on the orange arrow.
A centrifugal force outward would cancel the net force, and the ball would move in a straight line. And the centripetal force is the name of the job the string’s pull does here, not an extra force.
Practice · Calculate
Question
A 0.5 kg ball goes round at 2 m/s on a string 0.8 m long. How hard does the string pull on it?
Correct answer
2.5 N ± 2%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2 m/sfixed
- String length
- 0.8 mfixed
- Forces, then cut
- Whirlinghidden
- Other settings
- Mass
/nodes/whirl/props/mass= 0.5
- Accepted within
- ± 2%
- Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
- The string's pull on the ball, m·v²/r
/nodes/whirl/outputs/pull
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
1.25 N ± 3%
Misconception: Uses v/r or v²·r instead of v²/r for the centripetal acceleration.
Feedback from the catalogue
Check the units. gives : that is the angular speed, in radians per second, not an acceleration. gives . Only gives , a unit of acceleration.
1.6 N ± 3%
Misconception: Uses v/r or v²·r instead of v²/r for the centripetal acceleration.
Feedback from the catalogue
Check the units. gives : that is the angular speed, in radians per second, not an acceleration. gives . Only gives , a unit of acceleration.
Feedback for a right answer
, towards the peg.
Hint
First the acceleration, . Then Newton’s second law, .
Worked solution
- The givens: , and .
- The acceleration: , towards the peg.
- The force, from Newton’s second law: .
Or in one go: . If you got 1.25 N you forgot to square the speed, and if you got 1.6 N you multiplied by instead of dividing.
Practice · Reach the target
Question
The 0.2 kg ball. Change the Speed and the String length until the string pulls with 2 N, then press Check.
Goal
2 N ± 0.05 N
At the start of the step: 0.3333 N
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 1 m/s
- String length
- 0.6 m
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)fixed
- Read from the Scene at
- The string's pull on the ball, m·v²/r
/nodes/whirl/outputs/pull
One setting that reaches it
- Speed
- 2 m/s
- String length
- 0.4 m
Feedback for a right answer
The string pulls with 2 N: the acceleration from the last lesson, 10 m/s², times the mass, 0.2 kg.
Feedback for a wrong answer
Not yet. Look at the number on the orange arrow: if it is too small, raise the speed or shorten the string.
Hint
, so you need .
Worked solution
- You want with , that is, an acceleration of .
- So you need : for example and .
- Check: , which is what the orange arrow shows.
with also gives 2 N. At the start, at 1 m/s, the string pulls with only 0.33 N: to get six times as much, raising the speed times is enough, because it comes in squared.
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
The ball moves at 2 m/s on a string 0.5 m long, and the string pulls with 1.6 N. The string is lengthened to 1 m, at the same speed. What happens to the pull?
Correct answer
Correct It halves, to 0.8 N
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2 m/sfixed
- String length
- 0.5 mfixed
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)fixed
Choices
Correct It halves, to 0.8 N
Wrong It doubles, to 3.2 N
Misconception: Thinks that at the same speed a bigger circle needs a bigger pull.
Feedback from the catalogue
At the same speed, a bigger circle is a gentler turn: the direction changes more slowly. So gets smaller as the radius grows, and a string twice as long needs only half the pull.
Wrong It stays the same
Feedback
The speed is the same, but the turn is gentler: the direction changes more slowly, so less pull is needed.
Wrong It drops to a quarter, 0.4 N
Feedback
The radius is underneath to the first power, not squared: .
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- String length
- 1 mfixed
The Scene then shows: 0.8 N · The string's pull on the ball, m·v²/r
/nodes/whirl/outputs/pullA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
Half: . At the same speed, a big circle is a gentler turn.
Worked solution
- Before: .
- After: .
- The radius is in the denominator, so twice the radius gives half the force.
At the same speed, a bigger circle is a gentler turn: the period is twice as long, and the velocity turns half as fast. The feeling that a long string pulls harder comes from whirling at the same rate of turns: then the ball on the long string moves faster, , and the pull really does grow.
Practice · Choose
Question
A car drives at a steady speed round a roundabout, on a level road. Which force keeps it on the circle?
Correct answer
Correct The friction between the tyres and the road, sideways, towards the middle of the roundabout
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Speed
- 2 m/s
- String length
- 0.6 m
- Forces, then cut
- 0.4 (Whirling → Cut the string)
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct The friction between the tyres and the road, sideways, towards the middle of the roundabout
Wrong The centrifugal force
Misconception: Believes an outward centrifugal force acts on the circling body and balances the inward pull.
Feedback from the catalogue
If an outward force balanced the inward pull, the net force would be zero and the body would move in a straight line. It curves precisely because there is a net force inward. What you feel as an outward pull is the ball pulling on the string and your hand (Newton’s third law), or your own body carrying straight on while the car turns underneath it.
Wrong The engine’s force, pushing the car forward
Misconception: Thinks the acceleration, or a force, on a body moving on a circle points forward along its velocity.
Feedback from the catalogue
A force or an acceleration along the motion would change the size of the velocity, and here the size is constant. To change only the direction, the acceleration has to be at right angles to the motion: along the radius, towards the centre. Nothing needs to push the ball forward; without friction it keeps moving on its own.
Wrong The car’s weight
Feedback
The weight points down, and the road balances it. A vertical force cannot bend a horizontal path.
Feedback for a right answer
Friction points sideways, towards the middle of the roundabout, and it is the centripetal force here. On ice there is not enough friction, and the car carries straight on.
Worked solution
- Like the ball, the car is accelerating towards the middle of the roundabout, , so it needs a net force towards the centre.
- The weight and the road’s normal force are vertical and balance each other.
- The only horizontal force that can point sideways is the friction between the tyres and the road. Here it does the string’s job.
- That is why every bend has a top speed: when the most friction the tyres can get is less than , on a wet road for instance, the car skids and moves straighter than the roundabout.
No centrifugal force acts on the car; it is what the passengers feel as their bodies carry straight on.
Lesson 3 of 5 · About 30 minutes
Universal gravitation
Any two masses pull on each other, with the same force, which grows with the masses and weakens with the square of the distance. From the pull between two bodies in the Scene to your own weight.
The 6 steps and their answers
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
The second body has of the first one’s mass. Which body pulls harder on the other?
Correct answer
Correct They pull on each other with the same force
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 12 % of first
- Distance apart
- 9
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
Choices
Wrong The heavy body pulls harder on the light one
Misconception: Thinks the heavier body pulls harder on the lighter one than the lighter pulls on it.
Feedback from the catalogue
Gravity is mutual. By Newton’s third law, and in the formula , there is one number for both bodies: the Earth pulls on the Moon exactly as hard as the Moon pulls on the Earth. The difference is in the acceleration, : the same force moves the heavy body a little and the light one a lot.
Correct They pull on each other with the same force
Wrong The light body pulls harder on the heavy one
Feedback
The light body does move more, but because of its small mass, not because of a stronger force.
Wrong Only the heavy body pulls; the light one does not pull at all
Misconception: Thinks the heavier body pulls harder on the lighter one than the lighter pulls on it.
Feedback from the catalogue
Gravity is mutual. By Newton’s third law, and in the formula , there is one number for both bodies: the Earth pulls on the Moon exactly as hard as the Moon pulls on the Earth. The difference is in the acceleration, : the same force moves the heavy body a little and the light one a lot.
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
A prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
Both arrows are the same length and carry the same number. The same force, but the light body accelerates far more, so it looks as if only the heavy one pulls.
Worked solution
- By Newton’s third law, the force the first body exerts on the second is equal in size, and opposite in direction, to the force the second exerts on the first.
- In the law of gravitation too, , the two masses appear in the same place: there is one force, and it acts on both.
- What differs is the acceleration, . The second body’s mass is times smaller, so its acceleration is times bigger: it does most of the moving.
The feeling that the big body pulls harder comes from seeing only the small one move.
No practice question in this step.
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 100 % of first
- Distance apart
- 10
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
Two equal bodies apart pull on each other with a force of , in the Scene’s unit. They are moved to apart, three times as far. What will the pull be?
Correct answer
0.6944 ± 5%
A number prediction counts as right within ± 5%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 100 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 4
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Distance apart
- 12
The Scene then shows: 0.6944 · The pull between the bodies, in the Scene unit: 1 between two bodies like the first, 10 apart
/nodes/pair/outputs/pullA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
Three times as far, nine times as weak: .
Hint
The pull goes as one over the square of the distance: .
Worked solution
- The masses do not change, and .
- The distance grows times, so the pull shrinks times.
- .
A check in the Scene’s unit: . If you divided by and got about , you forgot that the distance is squared in the law.
Practice · Choose
Question
The second body’s mass is doubled, and so is the distance between the bodies. What happens to the pull between them?
Correct answer
Correct It halves
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 30 % of first
- Distance apart
- 6
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct It halves
Wrong It stays the same
Misconception: Thinks the pull falls in proportion to the distance (1/r), not to its square.
Feedback from the catalogue
The distance in the law of gravitation is squared: . Twice the distance gives a quarter of the pull, and three times the distance gives a ninth, not a third.
Wrong It doubles
Feedback
Twice the mass doubles the pull, but twice the distance divides it by four.
Wrong It drops to a quarter
Feedback
Twice the distance alone gives a quarter, but twice the mass doubles it back up.
Feedback for a right answer
The mass gives times , the distance divided by : half altogether. Try it in the Scene: from at to at .
Worked solution
- . Twice the mass, on top: times .
- Twice the distance, underneath and squared: divided by .
- Together: .
In the Scene: with the second mass at and a distance of the pull is about ; at and it is about , half. If you answered “it stays the same”, you divided by the distance without squaring it.
Practice · Calculate
Question
The Earth’s mass is and its radius is 6370 km. How hard does it pull on a 70 kg person standing on its surface? Use .
Correct answer
687 N ± 2%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of first
- Distance apart
- 9
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
- Accepted within
- ± 2%
- A fixed value in the question
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
4380000000 N ± 5%
Misconception: Thinks the pull falls in proportion to the distance (1/r), not to its square.
Feedback from the catalogue
The distance in the law of gravitation is squared: . Twice the distance gives a quarter of the pull, and three times the distance gives a ninth, not a third.
687000000 N ± 5%
Misconception: Puts a distance in kilometres into G·M·m/r², whose G is in metres.
Feedback from the catalogue
is built on metres, so has to be in metres too: . With kilometres the denominator is times too small, and the force comes out a million times too big.
Feedback for a right answer
, the person’s weight: , the acceleration of free fall.
Hint
The distance is measured from the Earth’s centre, and it has to be in metres.
Worked solution
- The givens: , , and , the distance between the centres.
- The law of gravitation: .
- The top: .
- The bottom: .
- .
That is exactly the weight, : divide by and you get . If you got an enormous number, you forgot to square , or put it in kilometres.
Practice · Calculate
Question
The second body’s mass is of the first one’s, and they are apart. How far is the first, heavy body from their shared centre of mass?
Correct answer
2 ± 0.05
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 25 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 10fixed
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
- Accepted within
- ± 0.05
- Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
- The first (heavier) body's distance from the centre of mass, Scene units
/nodes/pair/outputs/distance1
Wrong answers it recognises
0 ± 0.01
Misconception: Thinks the heavier body sits fixed at the centre while the lighter one goes round it.
Feedback from the catalogue
Both bodies go round their shared centre of mass. It lies on the line between them, closer to the heavier body, so that . The heavy body moves too, on a small circle. Only when the second body is negligible beside it does the centre of mass sit almost at the heavy body’s centre.
Feedback for a right answer
. The same force on both, but the heavy body’s acceleration is times smaller, so its circle is times smaller.
Hint
The centre of mass satisfies , and .
Worked solution
- Write and , in units of the first mass, and .
- The centre of mass: , so .
- Substitute: , so and .
The heavy body moves on a circle of radius and the light one on a circle of radius : four times bigger, like the ratio of the masses. If you answered , you assumed the heavy body stands still.
Lesson 4 of 5 · About 30 minutes
Orbits: a fall that never ends
A satellite is a body that keeps falling and keeps missing the Earth. Gravity is its centripetal force, and from that come its speed, its period, Kepler's third law, and why astronauts float.
The 6 steps and their answers
Practice · Choose
Question
The International Space Station orbits the Earth at a height of about 400 km. Why do the astronauts inside it float?
Correct answer
Correct They and the station are falling together round the Earth, with the same acceleration
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 9
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct They and the station are falling together round the Earth, with the same acceleration
Wrong There is no gravity that high up
Misconception: Thinks there is no gravity in orbit, so astronauts float because nothing pulls on them.
Feedback from the catalogue
At the height of the space station, about 400 km, gravity is still about of what it is on the ground. Without it the station would carry straight on into space instead of going round the Earth. The astronauts float because they and the station are falling together with the same acceleration, so nothing presses on them: that is free fall, not an absence of gravity.
Wrong Gravity is balanced by an outward centrifugal force
Misconception: Believes an outward centrifugal force acts on the circling body and balances the inward pull.
Feedback from the catalogue
If an outward force balanced the inward pull, the net force would be zero and the body would move in a straight line. It curves precisely because there is a net force inward. What you feel as an outward pull is the ball pulling on the string and your hand (Newton’s third law), or your own body carrying straight on while the car turns underneath it.
Wrong They are too far from the Earth, and gravity there is negligible
Misconception: Thinks there is no gravity in orbit, so astronauts float because nothing pulls on them.
Feedback from the catalogue
At the height of the space station, about 400 km, gravity is still about of what it is on the ground. Without it the station would carry straight on into space instead of going round the Earth. The astronauts float because they and the station are falling together with the same acceleration, so nothing presses on them: that is free fall, not an absence of gravity.
Feedback for a right answer
Shared free fall: gravity accelerates the station and everyone in it equally, so nothing presses on them. It is called weightlessness, but gravity is there.
Worked solution
- At a height of 400 km the distance from the Earth’s centre is , only about more than on the ground.
- Gravity is weaker by a factor of : it is still about of gravity on the ground.
- Gravity is the only force on the station and the astronauts, and it gives them all the same acceleration, towards the Earth’s centre. They fall together, so the floor does not press on them, and there is no weight to feel.
Nor is there a centrifugal force balancing gravity: if the forces were balanced, the station would move in a straight line.
Practice · Calculate
Question
What is the acceleration due to gravity at the height of the space station, 400 km above the Earth’s surface? The Earth’s mass is , its radius 6370 km, and .
Correct answer
8.69 m/s² ± 2%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 9
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
- Accepted within
- ± 2%
- A fixed value in the question
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
0 m/s² ± 0.01 m/s²
Misconception: Thinks there is no gravity in orbit, so astronauts float because nothing pulls on them.
Feedback from the catalogue
At the height of the space station, about 400 km, gravity is still about of what it is on the ground. Without it the station would carry straight on into space instead of going round the Earth. The astronauts float because they and the station are falling together with the same acceleration, so nothing presses on them: that is free fall, not an absence of gravity.
2490 m/s² ± 5%
Misconception: Uses the height above the ground instead of the distance from the Earth's centre as r.
Feedback from the catalogue
In the law of gravitation is the distance between the bodies’ centres. For a satellite at a height above the ground, , where is the Earth’s radius. A height of 400 km on its own is nowhere near the real distance to the centre.
Feedback for a right answer
, not much less than the on the ground. Gravity is certainly there.
Hint
, where is the distance from the Earth’s centre.
Worked solution
- The distance from the Earth’s centre: .
- A body of mass feels , so its acceleration is .
- .
- .
That is about of the on the ground. If you put in you got thousands of metres per second squared: is measured from the Earth’s centre, not from the ground.
Practice · Calculate
Question
How fast does the space station move on a circular orbit 400 km up? Use the same data: , and .
Correct answer
7670 m/s ± 1.5%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 9
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Other settings
- Forces
/nodes/pair/props/forces= 1
- Accepted within
- ± 1.5%
- A fixed value in the question
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
7910 m/s ± 1%
Misconception: Uses the Earth's radius alone for r, leaving out the height of the orbit.
Feedback from the catalogue
The satellite is not on the ground: its distance from the Earth’s centre is . With alone you get the speed of an orbit skimming the ground, about 7.9 km/s, not the speed at the station’s height.
31600 m/s ± 3%
Misconception: Uses the height above the ground instead of the distance from the Earth's centre as r.
Feedback from the catalogue
In the law of gravitation is the distance between the bodies’ centres. For a satellite at a height above the ground, , where is the Earth’s radius. A height of 400 km on its own is nowhere near the real distance to the centre.
Feedback for a right answer
, about 27,600 km/h: a full lap of the Earth in about minutes.
Hint
Gravity is the centripetal force: .
Worked solution
- On a circular orbit gravity is the centripetal force: .
- Cancel and one : , so .
- Put in : .
- The period: , about minutes.
If you got about 7910 m/s, you used the Earth’s radius without the height; if you got about 31,600 m/s, you used the height alone.
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
In the Scene, a small body () orbits a big one away, and one orbit takes about 3.3 s. It is moved out to , four times as far. How many times longer will an orbit take?
Correct answer
Correct times
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 4
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
Choices
Wrong times
Feedback
is , but the orbit itself is also times longer.
Wrong times
Misconception: Thinks the orbital period grows in proportion to the distance.
Feedback from the catalogue
Farther out, the orbit is both longer and slower, because shrinks with distance. Together the two effects give Kepler’s third law, : four times the distance gives times the period.
Correct times
Wrong times
Feedback
, not : times.
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Distance apart
- 16
The Scene then shows: 26.68 s · Seconds the Scene takes for one orbit
/nodes/pair/outputs/periodA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
times: the orbit is times longer and the speed times lower. That is , Kepler’s third law.
Worked solution
- On a circular orbit and .
- Substitute: , that is, : Kepler’s third law.
- Four times the distance: grows times.
- In the Scene: from about 3.3 s to about 26.7 s.
The orbit is times longer, and the body also moves times slower, because . Answering times counts only the length of the orbit.
Practice · Choose
Question
A second satellite, ten times heavier than the first, is put on the same circular orbit round the Earth. How fast must it move?
Correct answer
Correct At the same speed as the first
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 9
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct At the same speed as the first
Wrong Faster, because gravity pulls it harder
Misconception: Thinks a heavier satellite needs a different speed, or period, on the same orbit.
Feedback from the catalogue
The satellite’s mass cancels out: gives , with no in it. A heavier satellite is pulled harder, but it is also harder to turn by the same amount, just as all bodies fall with the same acceleration.
Wrong Slower, because it is harder to move
Misconception: Thinks a heavier satellite needs a different speed, or period, on the same orbit.
Feedback from the catalogue
The satellite’s mass cancels out: gives , with no in it. A heavier satellite is pulled harder, but it is also harder to turn by the same amount, just as all bodies fall with the same acceleration.
Wrong times faster
Misconception: Thinks a heavier satellite needs a different speed, or period, on the same orbit.
Feedback from the catalogue
The satellite’s mass cancels out: gives , with no in it. A heavier satellite is pulled harder, but it is also harder to turn by the same amount, just as all bodies fall with the same acceleration.
Feedback for a right answer
The satellite’s mass cancels, and depends only on the Earth’s mass and the distance. That is why a bolt that comes loose from the space station carries on beside it, on the same orbit.
Worked solution
- Gravity on the satellite is its centripetal force: .
- The mass appears on both sides and cancels: .
- is the Earth’s mass and is the same orbit, so is the same for both satellites.
The heavy satellite is pulled times harder, but it also takes times the force to turn it: the same sum that makes a heavy ball and a light ball fall together.
Practice · Reach the target
Question
The small body orbits away, and one orbit takes about 6.1 s in the Scene. Change the Distance apart until one orbit takes twice as long, about 12.3 s, then press Check.
Goal
12.26 s ± 3%
At the start of the step: 6.128 s
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Second mass
- 1 % of firstfixed
- Distance apart
- 6
- Show path
- ondefault
- Show the well
- Offdefault
- Read from the Scene at
- Seconds the Scene takes for one orbit
/nodes/pair/outputs/period
One setting that reaches it
- Distance apart
- 9.5
- Show path
- off
Feedback for a right answer
times the distance gives twice the period. That is how we know that Mars, whose year is nearly two of ours, is about times as far from the Sun as the Earth.
Feedback for a wrong answer
Not yet. If the orbit is too quick, move the body out; if it is too slow, bring it in.
Hint
, so : twice the time needs times the distance.
Worked solution
- From Kepler’s third law: .
- So .
- .
At an orbit takes about 12.2 s in the Scene. Doubling the distance to gives about 17.3 s, nearly three times: .
Lesson 5 of 5 · About 25 minutes
Angular momentum: a skater and a gyroscope
A spinning body keeps its angular momentum, L = Iω, as long as no torque acts on it: a skater who pulls in her arms and spins faster, the energy she adds, and a gyroscope that circles its stand instead of falling.
The 6 steps and their answers
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
The skater spins with her arms out, about one turn a second. The ice is smooth and nobody pushes her. What will happen when she pulls her arms in to her body?
Correct answer
Correct She will spin faster
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Arm reach
- 0.8 m
- Gyroscope spin
- 3000 rpm
- Show angular momentum
- Off
Choices
Correct She will spin faster
Wrong She will keep the same pace: nothing outside pushed her
Misconception: Thinks a skater can spin faster only if something outside pushes her, so pulling her arms in changes nothing.
Feedback from the catalogue
What is kept without a torque from outside is the angular momentum , not the angular velocity. As the arms come in, the moment of inertia falls, so rises by the same factor, with no push at all.
Wrong She will slow down, because the arms brake the spin
Feedback
The arms do not rub against anything. As they come in, their mass circles closer to the axis, and the skater has to turn faster, not slower.
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Arm reach
- 0.15 m
The Scene then shows: 2.601 Hz · The skater’s turns per second, L / (2π I)
/nodes/spin/outputs/spinA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
With her arms tucked she turns about times a second, more than twice as fast, with no push at all. Her angular momentum is kept, and what changed is her moment of inertia.
Worked solution
- A spinning body carries angular momentum . It changes only when something outside applies a torque to it.
- The ice is smooth, so the skater’s is fixed.
- As the arms come in towards the axis, falls, so must rise by the same factor.
If you expected her to keep the same pace, you took a faster spin to need a push. What is kept is the product , not .
Practice · Reach the target
Question
With her arms out, 0.8 m from the axis, the skater turns once a second. Change Arm reach until she turns exactly twice as fast, 2 Hz, and press Check.
Goal
2 Hz ± 0.03 Hz
At the start of the step: 1.001 Hz
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Arm reach
- 0.8 m
- Gyroscope spin
- 3000 rpmfixed
- Show angular momentum
- On
- Read from the Scene at
- The skater’s turns per second, L / (2π I)
/nodes/spin/outputs/spin
One setting that reaches it
- Arm reach
- 0.35 m
Feedback for a right answer
At about 0.35 m the moment of inertia is about 1.30 kg·m², half of the 2.59 kg·m² with her arms out, and the spin is doubled.
Feedback for a wrong answer
Not yet. With her arms closer to the axis she spins faster. Read the turns per second on the board.
Hint
Twice the spin means half the moment of inertia. Mass far from the axis counts by the square of its distance, so the arms need not come all the way in.
Worked solution
- is fixed, so doubles when halves: from 2.59 kg·m² to 1.30 kg·m².
- Part of is the body itself, 0.8 kg·m², which does not change. Only the arms can make up the difference.
- On the board that happens at about 0.35 m: set Arm reach there.
Halving the reach, to 0.4 m, cuts the arms’ share about four times, but the body’s share stays, so the whole falls by less than half, and she turns only about 1.86 Hz.
Practice · Calculate
Question
Her arms are tucked, and the board shows and . The energy of a spin is . How much energy does the skater’s spin have now?
Correct answer
133.2 J ± 2%
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Arm reach
- 0.15 mfixed
- Gyroscope spin
- 3000 rpmfixed
- Show angular momentum
- On
- Accepted within
- ± 2%
- Computed from the Scene at this step’s setting
- The energy of her spin, L² / 2I
/nodes/spin/outputs/energy
Any unit of the same quantity is accepted; it is converted before checking.
Wrong answers it recognises
51.25 J ± 2%
Misconception: Thinks the energy of a spin stays the same when the skater pulls her arms in, as the angular momentum does.
Feedback from the catalogue
The angular momentum is kept, but the energy grows as falls. The extra energy comes from her muscles: the arms keep trying to fly outward, and she does work pulling them in.
Feedback for a right answer
joules. With her arms out she had joules: the angular momentum is kept, but the energy grew by about 80 J.
Hint
On the board and , in SI units.
Worked solution
- Given: L ≈ 16.3 kg·m²/s, I ≈ 1.00 kg·m².
- .
- The energy is about 133 J.
If you answered about 51 J, that is the energy with her arms out. The energy is not kept: the skater does work pulling in arms that keep trying to fly outward, and that work becomes faster spin.
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
The gyroscope is not spinning, with one end of its axle resting on the stand: it has fallen against the post. What will happen if the wheel spins at 3000 rpm and the gyroscope is let go with its axle level?
Correct answer
Correct The axle will stay almost level and swing slowly round the stand
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Arm reach
- 0.8 mfixed
- Gyroscope spin
- 0 rpm
- Show angular momentum
- Off
Choices
Correct The axle will stay almost level and swing slowly round the stand
Wrong It will stay where it is, level: the spin cancels gravity
Misconception: Thinks a fast spin cancels or cuts gravity, so a gyroscope stays up because its weight is gone.
Feedback from the catalogue
The spin does not cancel gravity. The weight keeps acting, and the stand keeps holding it up. What the spin changes is what the weight does: its torque turns the angular momentum sideways, so the axle swings round instead of falling.
Wrong It will fall again, only more slowly
Feedback
The spin does not slow the fall: it turns it sideways. The torque of the weight changes the angular momentum in a level direction, so the axle moves round, not down.
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Gyroscope spin
- 3000 rpm
The Scene then shows: 3.084 s · Seconds for the gyroscope to circle its post once, once the wobble has settled; NaN when it has fallen
/nodes/spin/outputs/precessionPeriodA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
The axle stays almost level and goes round the stand about once every 3.1 s. That motion is called precession. Gravity still acts: without the stand the gyroscope would fall.
Worked solution
- The weight pulls the wheel down, and the stand pushes up at the pivot. Together they make a torque, pointing level, at right angles to the axle.
- A torque changes the angular momentum in its own direction. The spinning wheel’s angular momentum points along the axle, so at each moment it gains a little sideways.
- The axle swings sideways, not down, and keeps doing so as long as the wheel spins.
The spin does not cancel gravity: the weight keeps acting, and the stand keeps holding it up.
Practice · Predict, then look
Question
At 3000 rpm the gyroscope goes round its stand once every 3.1 s. How long will one circle take at 6000 rpm?
Correct answer
6.163 s ± 0.3 s
A number prediction counts as right within ± 0.3 s
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Arm reach
- 0.8 mfixed
- Gyroscope spin
- 3000 rpm
- Show angular momentum
- On
Once the prediction is locked in, the Scene changes
- Gyroscope spin
- 6000 rpm
The Scene then shows: 6.163 s · Seconds for the gyroscope to circle its post once, once the wobble has settled; NaN when it has fallen
/nodes/spin/outputs/precessionPeriodA prediction is never marked as a failure: the learner sees the outcome and the explanation either way.
Feedback for a right answer
About 6.2 s: twice the spin, half the rate of precession. A faster wheel has more angular momentum, and the same torque turns it less.
Worked solution
- A fast wheel precesses at : the torque divided by the angular momentum.
- The torque has not changed, and has doubled. So halves.
- The time per circle, , doubles: seconds.
If you predicted a shorter time, you expected a faster wheel to circle faster. It is the other way round: the more angular momentum, the harder it is to turn.
Practice · Choose
Question
In a real gyroscope, friction in the bearings slowly slows the wheel. What happens to the precession as the wheel slows?
Correct answer
Correct It circles faster and faster and dips more, until it falls
Setup, choices and feedback
The Scene at this step
- Arm reach
- 0.8 mfixed
- Gyroscope spin
- 800 rpm
- Show angular momentum
- On
Choices
Shown in a random order.
Correct It circles faster and faster and dips more, until it falls
Wrong It circles more and more slowly, until it stops
Misconception: Thinks a gyroscope precesses more slowly as its wheel slows, as if the circling followed the spin.
Feedback from the catalogue
The rate of precession is : the torque divided by the angular momentum. A slower wheel carries less angular momentum, so the same torque turns it faster. A slowing gyroscope circles faster, dips, and in the end falls.
Wrong The precession stays the same until the wheel stops
Feedback
The rate of precession depends on the wheel’s angular momentum, so it changes as soon as the wheel slows. Try 800 rpm: it already circles in under a second.
Feedback for a right answer
As the wheel slows it has less angular momentum, and the same torque turns it faster. At 800 rpm it already dips about and circles in under a second, and below about 325 rpm it falls.
Hint
Compare 3000 rpm with 800 rpm on the board.
Worked solution
- : as falls, rises.
- At 3000 rpm a circle takes 3.1 s, and at 800 rpm about 0.9 s.
- At slow spins the formula is no longer enough: the axle dips and wobbles (nutation), and in the end it rests against the post.
If you chose that it slows, you took the precession to follow the spin. It goes the opposite way.
Across the unit · 23 misconceptions
Misconception catalogue
Each common mistake this unit recognises, in a few words. Open one for what the learner reads when an answer matches it, and where it is asked.
Thinks a ball let go from a circle flies straight outward, away from the centre.
- The learner reads
The moment the string is cut there is no sideways force on the ball at all, and by Newton’s first law it carries on with the velocity it had at that instant: along the tangent to the circle, at right angles to the string. Nothing was pushing it outward before, so nothing throws it outward now. It does move away from the peg, but only because it goes straight on while the circle would have kept curving.
- Recognised in
Thinks a ball let go from a circle keeps curving round, as if it remembered the circle.
- The learner reads
The ball has no memory of the circle. Its path curved only because the string pulled it inward at every moment. Without that pull nothing bends the path, and the ball goes straight on along the tangent, at a steady speed.
- Recognised in
Thinks a body moving at a constant speed has no acceleration, even on a circle.
- The learner reads
Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, and velocity is a vector: a size and a direction. On a circle the size stays the same, but the direction changes all the time, so there is an acceleration. It points towards the centre, and its size is .
- Recognised in
Thinks the acceleration, or a force, on a body moving on a circle points forward along its velocity.
- The learner reads
A force or an acceleration along the motion would change the size of the velocity, and here the size is constant. To change only the direction, the acceleration has to be at right angles to the motion: along the radius, towards the centre. Nothing needs to push the ball forward; without friction it keeps moving on its own.
Believes an outward centrifugal force acts on the circling body and balances the inward pull.
- The learner reads
If an outward force balanced the inward pull, the net force would be zero and the body would move in a straight line. It curves precisely because there is a net force inward. What you feel as an outward pull is the ball pulling on the string and your hand (Newton’s third law), or your own body carrying straight on while the car turns underneath it.
Thinks the centripetal acceleration, and the pull, grow in proportion to the speed: twice the speed, twice the pull.
- The learner reads
The speed comes in squared: . At twice the speed the direction has to change twice as fast, and there is twice as much velocity to turn, so the acceleration, and the pull with it, grow times.
- Recognised in
Divides the radius by the speed for the period, forgetting the circumference 2πr.
- The learner reads
In one turn the ball covers the whole circumference of the circle, , not one radius. So . Dividing gives only the time to cover one radius, about a sixth of a turn.
- Recognised in
Uses v/r or v²·r instead of v²/r for the centripetal acceleration.
- The learner reads
Check the units. gives : that is the angular speed, in radians per second, not an acceleration. gives . Only gives , a unit of acceleration.
Thinks that at the same speed a bigger circle needs a bigger pull.
- The learner reads
At the same speed, a bigger circle is a gentler turn: the direction changes more slowly. So gets smaller as the radius grows, and a string twice as long needs only half the pull.
- Recognised in
Adds the centripetal force as a force of its own, on top of the real forces on the body.
- The learner reads
Centripetal force is not an extra kind of force but the name of a job: the net force pointing at the centre. Here the string’s pull does that job; for a car going round a bend, the friction between tyres and road; for the Moon, gravity. In a free-body diagram you draw only the real forces, and check that their sum points at the centre and equals .
- Recognised in
Thinks the heavier body pulls harder on the lighter one than the lighter pulls on it.
- The learner reads
Gravity is mutual. By Newton’s third law, and in the formula , there is one number for both bodies: the Earth pulls on the Moon exactly as hard as the Moon pulls on the Earth. The difference is in the acceleration, : the same force moves the heavy body a little and the light one a lot.
- Recognised in
Thinks the pull falls in proportion to the distance (1/r), not to its square.
- The learner reads
The distance in the law of gravitation is squared: . Twice the distance gives a quarter of the pull, and three times the distance gives a ninth, not a third.
Puts a distance in kilometres into G·M·m/r², whose G is in metres.
- The learner reads
is built on metres, so has to be in metres too: . With kilometres the denominator is times too small, and the force comes out a million times too big.
- Recognised in
Thinks the heavier body sits fixed at the centre while the lighter one goes round it.
- The learner reads
Both bodies go round their shared centre of mass. It lies on the line between them, closer to the heavier body, so that . The heavy body moves too, on a small circle. Only when the second body is negligible beside it does the centre of mass sit almost at the heavy body’s centre.
- Recognised in
Thinks there is no gravity in orbit, so astronauts float because nothing pulls on them.
- The learner reads
At the height of the space station, about 400 km, gravity is still about of what it is on the ground. Without it the station would carry straight on into space instead of going round the Earth. The astronauts float because they and the station are falling together with the same acceleration, so nothing presses on them: that is free fall, not an absence of gravity.
Thinks a heavier satellite needs a different speed, or period, on the same orbit.
- The learner reads
The satellite’s mass cancels out: gives , with no in it. A heavier satellite is pulled harder, but it is also harder to turn by the same amount, just as all bodies fall with the same acceleration.
- Recognised in
Uses the height above the ground instead of the distance from the Earth's centre as r.
- The learner reads
In the law of gravitation is the distance between the bodies’ centres. For a satellite at a height above the ground, , where is the Earth’s radius. A height of 400 km on its own is nowhere near the real distance to the centre.
Uses the Earth's radius alone for r, leaving out the height of the orbit.
- The learner reads
The satellite is not on the ground: its distance from the Earth’s centre is . With alone you get the speed of an orbit skimming the ground, about 7.9 km/s, not the speed at the station’s height.
- Recognised in
Thinks the orbital period grows in proportion to the distance.
- The learner reads
Farther out, the orbit is both longer and slower, because shrinks with distance. Together the two effects give Kepler’s third law, : four times the distance gives times the period.
- Recognised in
Thinks a skater can spin faster only if something outside pushes her, so pulling her arms in changes nothing.
- The learner reads
What is kept without a torque from outside is the angular momentum , not the angular velocity. As the arms come in, the moment of inertia falls, so rises by the same factor, with no push at all.
- Recognised in
Thinks the energy of a spin stays the same when the skater pulls her arms in, as the angular momentum does.
- The learner reads
The angular momentum is kept, but the energy grows as falls. The extra energy comes from her muscles: the arms keep trying to fly outward, and she does work pulling them in.
- Recognised in
Thinks a fast spin cancels or cuts gravity, so a gyroscope stays up because its weight is gone.
- The learner reads
The spin does not cancel gravity. The weight keeps acting, and the stand keeps holding it up. What the spin changes is what the weight does: its torque turns the angular momentum sideways, so the axle swings round instead of falling.
- Recognised in
Thinks a gyroscope precesses more slowly as its wheel slows, as if the circling followed the spin.
- The learner reads
The rate of precession is : the torque divided by the angular momentum. A slower wheel carries less angular momentum, so the same torque turns it faster. A slowing gyroscope circles faster, dips, and in the end falls.
- Recognised in